According to TechCrunch, Cluely founder Roy Lee admitted at TechCrunch Disrupt 2025 that his startup may have launched too early with a product that “barely works.” The company burst onto the scene in April with rage bait marketing claiming it could help users “cheat on everything,” then saw ARR jump from $3 million to $7 million in one week during summer 2025. In June, Cluely secured a $15 million Series A from Andreessen Horowitz and introduced an enterprise product for sales calls and customer support. But earlier this week, the company pivoted to become an AI assistant for meetings, specifically targeting the consumer market with note-taking features. Lee now refuses to share revenue numbers, saying “there’s no upside” to revealing performance metrics.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
Viral hype meets reality
Here’s the thing about viral marketing: it gets you attention, but it doesn’t guarantee you’ll keep it. Cluely’s journey from “cheat on everything” provocateur to yet another AI note-taker is basically a case study in what happens when the hype train derails. Lee built his reputation on controversy – getting suspended from Columbia University for building cheating tools – and tried to monetize that notoriety. But now he’s playing it safe in the most crowded AI market there is.
And let’s be real – the AI meeting notes space is absolutely flooded. Every other startup seems to be building “the best AI note taker” these days. Lee’s touting features like “sending follow-up emails” as if that’s some revolutionary capability. But when you’re competing against established players and countless newcomers, what actually makes you different? The pivot feels reactive rather than strategic.
The numbers game
What’s really telling is Lee’s sudden reluctance to share metrics. Back in summer, he was boasting about that $3M to $7M ARR jump within a week. Now? “What I’ve learned is you should never share revenue numbers.” That’s quite the turnaround. His reasoning – that nobody talks about your success but everyone talks about your failures – sounds more like damage control than wisdom.
Meanwhile, dozens of other AI founders are happily sharing explosive growth numbers. In today’s AI gold rush, transparency about traction has become table stakes for credibility. When you suddenly go quiet on metrics after being so vocal, people notice. It makes you wonder: is Cluely’s growth actually sustainable, or was that initial spike just curiosity from the controversial launch?
Enterprise ambitions fade
The shift from enterprise to consumer is particularly revealing. Just months ago, Cluely was selling itself as a solution for sales calls, customer support, and remote tutoring. Now it’s “starting with the consumer” for meeting notes. That’s a massive scope reduction. Enterprise sales are hard – really hard – and it seems like Cluely discovered that the hard way.
Building tools that actually help sales teams or improve customer support requires deep understanding of complex workflows. It’s not something you can fake with a “barely works” MVP. The consumer meeting notes space might be crowded, but at least the use case is straightforward. Still, you have to wonder if this pivot came too late after burning through that initial viral attention.
Attention economy lessons
Cluely’s story highlights a fundamental truth in today’s startup landscape: viral moments don’t equal sustainable businesses. You can get everyone talking with controversial marketing, like Lee did with his “cheat on everything” positioning. But if the product doesn’t deliver real value, that attention evaporates faster than you can spend your Series A funding.
The real test for any AI startup isn’t whether they can get trending on social media – it’s whether they can solve actual problems for users. As Lee himself admitted on stage at TechCrunch Disrupt, maybe they launched too early with something that barely worked. In the end, sustainable growth comes from product-market fit, not just clever marketing. And right now, it looks like Cluely is still searching for that fit.
