According to Engineering News, TotalEnergies has informed Mozambique that its liquefied natural gas project costs have increased by $4.5 billion during the four-year suspension, with the company requesting a ten-year extension to its production agreement. The project, which was halted in 2021 due to Islamist militant attacks, now expects first production in the first half of 2029 rather than the original 2024 target. This substantial cost escalation raises critical questions about the project’s viability and timing.
Table of Contents
Understanding the Project’s Complex Context
The Mozambique LNG project represents one of Africa’s largest energy infrastructure developments, situated in the resource-rich Rovuma Basin. Liquefied natural gas projects of this scale typically involve massive capital expenditure for liquefaction trains, offshore platforms, and specialized shipping infrastructure. What makes this project particularly challenging is its location in Cabo Delgado province, an area that has experienced persistent security issues despite international military support from Rwanda and other regional partners. The project’s 40% completion status before the 2021 shutdown means significant sunk costs are already at stake.
Critical Security and Economic Challenges
The decision to continue work in “containment mode” with air and sea access only reveals the ongoing security fragility that the source material doesn’t fully address. This operational constraint dramatically increases logistical complexity and costs beyond the stated $4.5 billion increase. More concerning is the force majeure extension request—while legally justified, it signals TotalEnergies’ lack of confidence in near-term security stabilization. The company’s insistence on a decade-long extension suggests they anticipate prolonged operational challenges, potentially undermining investor confidence in Mozambique’s broader energy development plans.
Broader Industry Implications
This cost escalation and delay comes at a precarious time for global LNG markets. European demand surged following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, but long-term demand projections face uncertainty from renewable energy transitions. For major energy companies, the Mozambique situation highlights the increasing risk premium associated with projects in politically unstable regions. Competitors like ExxonMobil, developing a separate project nearby, will likely face similar cost pressures and security challenges. The timing is particularly problematic given that first production in 2029 may coincide with peak global LNG supply from competing projects in Qatar and the United States.
Realistic Project Outlook
While TotalEnergies has technically lifted the force majeure, the project’s future remains highly uncertain. The Mozambique government faces a difficult balancing act—approving the cost increases and extension could set problematic precedents for other resource projects, while rejection risks losing one of the country’s largest potential revenue sources. Given the complex international partnership structure involving Japanese, Indian, and Thai companies, further delays seem inevitable as each stakeholder reassesses their risk exposure. The most likely outcome is a negotiated compromise with phased approvals, but the original project economics have fundamentally deteriorated, potentially requiring complete financial restructuring.
