South Korea’s 52-Hour Workweek Dilemma: Innovation vs. Regulation in Deep Tech Race

The Global Work Culture Clash in Technology

As nations compete fiercely in the deep technology revolution spanning artificial intelligence, semiconductors, and quantum computing, workplace regulations have become an unexpected battleground. While China’s notorious “996” culture (9 am to 9 pm, six days weekly) has drawn international attention, South Korea presents a fascinating case study of balancing worker protection with technological competitiveness through its 52-hour workweek system.

The Global Work Culture Clash in Technology
South Korea’s Regulatory Framework
The Investor Perspective
The Engineering Reality: Creativity vs. Clock-Watching
Seeking Flexible Solutions
Motivation Beyond Mandates
International Context
The Path Forward

South Korea’s Regulatory Framework

South Korea’s current labor landscape mandates a 40-hour standard workweek with up to 12 hours of overtime, typically compensated at 150% of regular pay or higher. The 52-hour cap, initially implemented in 2018 for large corporations and public institutions, expanded to all businesses by January 2025. Violations carry significant penalties including fines, executive imprisonment, and civil liability., as our earlier report, according to market analysis

Earlier this year, the government introduced a special extended work program permitting up to 64 weekly hours with both employee consent and government approval. For critical deep tech sectors like semiconductors, approval periods were temporarily extended from three to six months, though industry reports indicate limited uptake of these provisions., according to further reading

The Investor Perspective

Yongkwan Lee, CEO of Bluepoint Partners, acknowledges the regulatory challenge in investment decisions. “The 52-hour workweek is indeed a challenging factor when investing in globally competitive sectors like semiconductors, artificial intelligence, and quantum computing,” he told TechCrunch. For early-stage deep tech companies where technologies remain under development, strict hour limitations can potentially slow progress toward critical business milestones.

However, another Seoul-based venture capitalist offered a contrasting view, noting that many venture companies don’t strictly track working hours and that compliance concerns appear minimal among R&D-focused firms. The greater regulatory impact, this investor suggested, falls on labor-intensive industries like logistics and manufacturing where overtime costs significantly affect thin profit margins.

The Engineering Reality: Creativity vs. Clock-Watching

Bohyung Kim, CTO of AI startup LeMong, articulates the tension many technical leaders experience. “Engineers work to find practical solutions to complex problems,” Kim explained. “Our work isn’t about completing predefined tasks within fixed hours. It’s about using creativity and deep focus to solve challenges and create new value.”, according to industry reports

Kim emphasizes that breakthrough moments often transcend scheduled hours. “When an idea strikes or a technical breakthrough happens, the concept of time disappears. If a system forces you to stop at that moment, it breaks the flow and can actually reduce efficiency.”, according to related coverage

He also highlights important distinctions between engineering roles. “Even among engineers, production roles in manufacturing differ from R&D positions. In manufacturing, productivity is directly linked to working hours, so schedules need to account for industrial safety.”

Seeking Flexible Solutions

Huiyong Lee, LeMong’s co-founder, proposes a monthly averaging system as a practical compromise. “For companies like ours, intensive development efforts are often required for approximately two weeks prior to a product launch,” he noted. A flexible approach would permit around 60 hours weekly before launches and 40 hours afterward, maintaining the 52-hour average while accommodating project cycles.

Lee advocates for differentiated standards for deep tech and R&D-focused companies, particularly for smaller startups with 10-20 employees that require operational agility. This perspective finds support in local surveys indicating that 70.4% of startup employees would work additional hours with proper compensation.

Motivation Beyond Mandates

Kim observes that high performers often voluntarily extend their hours, driven by achievement rather than regulation. “Engineers are far more motivated to dive in when their efforts are recognized, whether through performance bonuses, stock options, or acknowledgment of technical contributions,” he said.

This suggests that in knowledge-intensive industries, market-based incentives might prove more effective than rigid time tracking. “In high-tech, R&D, and IT industries, as well as in globally competitive firms where technical expertise is key, decisions about flexible work hours should be driven by market logic,” Kim concluded.

International Context

South Korea’s approach occupies a middle ground globally. European standards typically range from 33-48 hours weekly, while the U.S. maintains a 40-hour baseline with unlimited overtime for non-exempt employees. Singapore’s 44-hour standard with substantial overtime allowances contrasts with Japan’s 40-hour week plus overtime limits.

According to European labor statistics, actual working hours vary significantly across industries and nations, suggesting that one-size-fits-all approaches may not suit innovation-driven sectors.

The Path Forward

As South Korea’s government considers scaling back special exemptions and tightening regulations, the deep tech community continues seeking solutions that protect workers without stifling innovation. The fundamental challenge remains balancing employee wellbeing with the intense, unpredictable workflows characteristic of breakthrough technological development.

For global competitors in semiconductors, AI, and quantum computing, the question isn’t merely about hourly limits but whether regulatory frameworks can accommodate the creative bursts and concentrated efforts that drive technological advancement. As the deep tech race accelerates, South Korea’s experiment with work-hour regulation may offer valuable lessons for nations seeking both innovation leadership and worker protection.

References

This article aggregates information from publicly available sources. All trademarks and copyrights belong to their respective owners.

Note: Featured image is for illustrative purposes only and does not represent any specific product, service, or entity mentioned in this article.

Qlik has been positioned as a Leader in the IDC MarketScape Worldwide Business Intelligence and Analytics Platforms 2025 Vendor Assessment. The recognition highlights Qlik’s strength in delivering trusted analytics with AI capabilities that enable faster decision-making across organizations.

Qlik has achieved Leader status in the prestigious IDC MarketScape: Worldwide Business Intelligence and Analytics Platforms 2025 Vendor Assessment, solidifying its position in the competitive business intelligence and analytics landscape. This recognition comes as organizations increasingly prioritize data-driven decision making and seek platforms that can deliver actionable insights with speed and accuracy.