According to Bloomberg Business, the A$1.9 billion RQI Australian Value Fund is beating the market by betting that companies with higher ESG credentials are actually more efficient and profitable. The fund from RQI Investors, which is the quantitative arm of First Sentier Investors, uses factors like corporate culture and climate impact as indicators for efficiency when selecting Australian stocks. Senior quant portfolio manager Joanna Nash explained their approach of treating ESG metrics as business efficiency signals rather than just ethical considerations. The strategy has proven successful, with the fund outperforming its benchmark across multiple time horizons despite the broader skepticism around ESG investing performance.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
The Smart Way to Do ESG
Here’s what makes this approach different from typical ESG funds. Instead of just screening out “bad” companies or chasing high ESG scores for virtue signaling purposes, they’re treating these factors as actual business intelligence. Corporate culture quality? That’s a predictor of employee retention and productivity. Climate impact management? That’s operational efficiency and risk mitigation in disguise.
Basically, they’ve cracked the code that many ESG critics miss – when done right, these aren’t just feel-good metrics. They’re leading indicators of which companies are better managed, more forward-thinking, and ultimately more profitable. And in the quantitative world where you’re looking for any edge you can find, these signals apparently provide one.
Why Quant Funds Can Pull This Off
Traditional ESG investing often gets criticized for being too subjective or politically motivated. But quant funds like this one bring a different approach entirely. They’re not making moral judgments – they’re running the numbers to see if certain ESG characteristics correlate with financial performance. And apparently, in the Australian market at least, they do.
The real question is whether this is specific to Australia or if it’s a broader pattern that other quant shops will start exploiting. Australian markets have certain characteristics – heavy on resources, concentrated sectors – that might make these signals particularly valuable there. But you can bet if this performance continues, we’ll see copycats emerging globally.
What’s interesting is that this comes from RQI Investors, the quant division of a much larger traditional asset manager. It suggests that even within established financial institutions, there’s recognition that quantitative approaches can find alpha in unexpected places.
Where ESG Investing Goes From Here
This feels like ESG 2.0 – moving beyond the simplistic “good company vs bad company” framework toward a more sophisticated understanding of how environmental, social and governance factors actually drive business performance. The fund‘s success suggests that maybe the problem wasn’t with ESG concepts themselves, but with how they were being implemented.
Now, the big test will be whether this performance is sustainable as more money flows into similar strategies. Quant investing has a way of working until everyone’s doing it, at which point the edge disappears. But for now, it’s a compelling case study in how to make ESG investing actually work for investors rather than just making them feel good about their portfolio.
